<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Playoffs: Referee Assignments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/</link>
	<description>NCAA and NFL Referee news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-6113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-6113</guid>
		<description>Your vision must be foggy, because the interception you are refering to was correctly overturned. He did not have posession of the ball and it grazed the ground therefore is not an interception. Learn the rules of the game before you come on here with a sore loser attitude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your vision must be foggy, because the interception you are refering to was correctly overturned. He did not have posession of the ball and it grazed the ground therefore is not an interception. Learn the rules of the game before you come on here with a sore loser attitude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willie</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5244</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5244</guid>
		<description>Get over it,SORE LOSER! GO PACK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get over it,SORE LOSER! GO PACK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>What else, a sore loser. Or you&#039;re a blind winner. If the Saints were better, they obviously didn&#039;t need the refs&#039; help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What else, a sore loser. Or you&#8217;re a blind winner. If the Saints were better, they obviously didn&#8217;t need the refs&#8217; help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willie</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5242</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5242</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you hang it up! The SAINTS won fair and square, with no help from the officials. Why don&#039;t you make a list of the &quot;bad calls&quot; the Colts got away with... you&#039;re obviously a SORE LOSER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you hang it up! The SAINTS won fair and square, with no help from the officials. Why don&#8217;t you make a list of the &#8220;bad calls&#8221; the Colts got away with&#8230; you&#8217;re obviously a SORE LOSER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5241</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5241</guid>
		<description>9. After the INT, illegal block in the back by Will Smith - missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9. After the INT, illegal block in the back by Will Smith &#8211; missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Scott Green for a job well done. That proves all the haters wrong.  Not one call was wrong besides maybe offensive PI on Pierre Garcon. Still, Great Job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Scott Green for a job well done. That proves all the haters wrong.  Not one call was wrong besides maybe offensive PI on Pierre Garcon. Still, Great Job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willie</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5232</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5232</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s canterbury????... The SAINTS are the Super Bowl Champions!!! The officiating crew did a great job... they were invisible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s canterbury????&#8230; The SAINTS are the Super Bowl Champions!!! The officiating crew did a great job&#8230; they were invisible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John 2</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5229</link>
		<dc:creator>John 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5229</guid>
		<description>For all the gruff Scott Green took, he and the crew did a good job in the Super Bowl.  They let the teams play and I don&#039;t think one call was missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the gruff Scott Green took, he and the crew did a good job in the Super Bowl.  They let the teams play and I don&#8217;t think one call was missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5171</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5171</guid>
		<description>Well this should be interesting with Green as the ref.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this should be interesting with Green as the ref.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://www.football-refs.com/201001/nfl-playoffs-referee-assignments/comment-page-1/#comment-5159</link>
		<dc:creator>russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-refs.com/?p=978#comment-5159</guid>
		<description>About 6 people on this site alone have reported the ref to be Scott Green. Look about 5 posts above this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 6 people on this site alone have reported the ref to be Scott Green. Look about 5 posts above this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

